Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally

Silver Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower , Tucker

Tract 13089021912 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 3,485 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

With a score of 6.6/10, tract 13089021912 in Silver Ridge in Tucker ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,485 residents. It lands near the 89th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 76% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 76% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $162,695 a year. Renters make up 2% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 1% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units1,163
Renter share2.1%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$162,695

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Silver Ridge
Moderate
Within parent city
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#17 of 18 tracts In Tucker
Very Low
Within county
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#175 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very Low
Within state
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#2,378 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tucker and the region

Centroid at 33.8355, -84.1587 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silver Ridge scores 2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucker
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucker
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucker
7.3

How Silver Ridge compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Silver Ridge risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.02.0This tracttract 021912Tucker: 2.82.8Tuckerparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 26

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 85Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 22.05%Avg annual filing rate
  • 42.1%Peak (2013)
  • 3Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890219122004: 6 filings (0.41/100 renter HHs)2007: 12 filings (0.88/100 renter HHs)2011: 12 filings (31.58/100 renter HHs)2012: 13 filings (34.21/100 renter HHs)2013: 16 filings (42.11/100 renter HHs)2014: 12 filings (31.58/100 renter HHs)2015: 11 filings (28.95/100 renter HHs)2016: 3 filings (6.67/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 18Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silver Ridge

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tucker eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 26th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021912

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021912?

Census tract 13089021912 in the Silver Ridge neighborhood scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021912?

4.0% of residents in tract 13089021912 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,485.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021912?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 71th, minority 63th, housing 1th.
Q4

Is tract 13089021912 considered part of Silver Ridge?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021912 fall within Silver Ridge (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021912?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 85 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021912 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 22.05% of renter households, peaking at 42.1% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 13089021912 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13089021912 compare to Tucker overall?

Tract 13089021912 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Tucker at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tucker

Top eight tracts in Tucker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related