Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Silver Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower , Tucker

Tract 13089021912 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 3,485 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 13089021912 covers part of the Silver Ridge area of Tucker, GA, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,485 residents. The severe-burden share is 76%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 1% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units1,163
Renter share2.1%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$162,695

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Silver Ridge
Moderate
Within parent city
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 18 tracts In Tucker
Very Low
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#198 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very Low
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#2,121 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tucker and the region

Centroid at 33.8355, -84.1587 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silver Ridge scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucker
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucker
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucker
7.3

How Silver Ridge compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Silver Ridge risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0219124.3Tuckerparent city4.5Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 26

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 85Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 22.05%Avg annual filing rate
  • 42.1%Peak (2013)
  • 3Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 13089021912
Filings dropped 50% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 18Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silver Ridge

76% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the DeKalb County average of 52.2%. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.7/10.

Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.7/10. Against the DeKalb County average of 4.5, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.5 points.

Food insecurity runs 7.6% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 5.0% against 15.2% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 85 evictions over 8 years of observation.

The worst year on record was 2013, when 42.1% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 22.0% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 2% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 3.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021912

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021912?

Census tract 13089021912 in the Silver Ridge neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021912?

4.0% of residents in tract 13089021912 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,485.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021912?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 71th, minority 63th, housing 1th.
Q4

Is tract 13089021912 considered part of Silver Ridge?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021912 fall within Silver Ridge (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021912?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 85 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021912 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 22.05% of renter households, peaking at 42.1% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 13089021912 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13089021912 compare to Tucker overall?

Tract 13089021912 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Tucker at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tucker

Top eight tracts in Tucker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related