Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally

Rock Bridge Eviction Risk: Moderate , Stonecrest

Tract 13089023315 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 7,509 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Census tract 13089023315 covers part of the Rock Bridge area of Stonecrest, GA, and scores 4.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 7,509 residents. Cost burden runs 75% here against 52.2% across DeKalb County.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 3% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units2,362
Renter share13.6%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate6.6%
Median income$80,078

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Rock Bridge
Moderate
Within parent city
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#15 of 19 tracts In Stonecrest
Low
Within county
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#118 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Moderate
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#1,273 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Stonecrest and the region

Centroid at 33.7542, -84.0660 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rock Bridge scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Stonecrest
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
6.6% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,439 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Stonecrest
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Stonecrest
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Stonecrest
7.8

How Rock Bridge compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rock Bridge risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.1This tracttract 0233154.8Stonecrestparent city4.5Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 57

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 631Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 40.09%Avg annual filing rate
  • 50.7%Peak (2016)
  • 107Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 13089023315
Filings climbed 296% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 658Total filings 2020-21
  • 8.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rock Bridge

What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.7/10. 30% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.9/10.

On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.8/10. The filing record is not thin: 631 evictions over 8 years of observation.

Housing insecurity runs 21.8% against 14.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,439, 10% below the Stonecrest average.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2016 at 50.7% of renter households.

In a typical year about 40.1% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #47,371 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023315

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023315?

Census tract 13089023315 in the Rock Bridge neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089023315?

Median gross rent is $1,439/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 75% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023315?

6.6% of residents in tract 13089023315 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,509.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023315?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 79th, minority 95th, housing 7th.
Q5

Is tract 13089023315 considered part of Rock Bridge?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089023315 fall within Rock Bridge (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089023315?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 631 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089023315 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 40.09% of renter households, peaking at 50.7% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089023315 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089023315 compare to Stonecrest overall?

Tract 13089023315 scores 4.1/10, lower than the parent city of Stonecrest at 4.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Stonecrest eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Stonecrest

Top eight tracts in Stonecrest ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related