Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally

Ansley Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Atlanta

Tract 13121000400 · Fulton County, GA · pop 2,014 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

In the Ansley Park neighborhood of Atlanta, census tract 13121000400 scores 5.4/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #38,772 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 33% of renter households, a high level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,047 a month while the average household earns $156,528 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 33% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 22% Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,025
Renter share33.1%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate3.0%
Median income$156,528

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Ansley Park
Very High
Within parent city
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#157 of 180 tracts In Atlanta
Very Low
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#204 of 327 tracts In Fulton County
Low
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#2,209 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Atlanta and the region

Centroid at 33.7883, -84.3785 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ansley Park scores 2.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Atlanta
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
3.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,047 rent vs county FMR
6.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Atlanta
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Atlanta
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Atlanta
4.0

How Ansley Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ansley Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.32.3This tracttract 000400Atlanta: 3.43.4Atlantaparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 100Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 5.85%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.7%Peak (2001)
  • 12Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 131210004002001: 28 filings (7.70/100 renter HHs)2003: 24 filings (6.60/100 renter HHs)2014: 17 filings (5.47/100 renter HHs)2015: 19 filings (6.11/100 renter HHs)2016: 12 filings (3.37/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 57% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 90Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ansley Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ansley Park

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 6.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Atlanta eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Fulton County average of 5.7 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 4.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 17th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 13121000400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13121000400?

Census tract 13121000400 in the Ansley Park neighborhood scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13121000400?

Median gross rent is $2,047/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13121000400?

3.0% of residents in tract 13121000400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,014.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13121000400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 6th, minority 36th, housing 62th.
Q5

Is tract 13121000400 considered part of Ansley Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13121000400 fall within Ansley Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13121000400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 100 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 13121000400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.85% of renter households, peaking at 7.7% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13121000400 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13121000400 compare to Atlanta overall?

Tract 13121000400 scores 2.3/10, lower than the parent city of Atlanta at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Atlanta eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 13121000400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Atlanta

Top eight tracts in Atlanta ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related