Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,316 of 84,120 nationally

Sweet Auburn Eviction Risk: Moderate , Atlanta

Tract 13121002802 · Fulton County, GA · pop 1,715 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 13121002802 belongs to the Sweet Auburn neighborhood of Atlanta, Georgia. It is home to 1,715 residents and scores 6.6/10, an elevated reading for landlords. That is riskier than about 89% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 46% of renter households, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $850 a month while the average household earns $16,620 a year, roughly 61% of income at the averages. Renters make up 98% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46% Stable renters 53% Owners 1%
Tract context
Occupied units782
Renter share98.2%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate39.1%
Median income$16,620

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Sweet Auburn
Very High
Within parent city
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 180 tracts In Atlanta
Very High
Within county
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 327 tracts In Fulton County
Very High
Within state
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#247 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Atlanta and the region

Centroid at 33.7569, -84.3801 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sweet Auburn scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Atlanta
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
39.1% poverty · this tract
9.8
Supply constraint
$850 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Atlanta
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Atlanta
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Atlanta
4.0

How Sweet Auburn compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sweet Auburn risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.85.8This tracttract 002802Atlanta: 3.43.4Atlantaparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,055Total filings 2020-21
  • 27.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 70 filings (700.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 65 filings (650.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 77 filings (770.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 51 filings (510.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Sweet Auburn. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sweet Auburn

What moves this score most is economic stress at 9.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Atlanta eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Fulton County average of 5.7 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 26.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 18.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13121002802

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13121002802?

Census tract 13121002802 in the Sweet Auburn neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13121002802?

Median gross rent is $850/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13121002802?

39.1% of residents in tract 13121002802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,715.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13121002802?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 56th, minority 87th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 13121002802 considered part of Sweet Auburn?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13121002802 fall within Sweet Auburn (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13121002802 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13121002802 compare to Atlanta overall?

Tract 13121002802 scores 5.8/10, higher than the parent city of Atlanta at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Atlanta eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 13121002802 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 36% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Atlanta

Top eight tracts in Atlanta ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related