Neighborhood · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally
Fireside Eviction Risk: Lower , Fairburn
Tract 13121010519 ·
Fulton County, GA · pop 3,605 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
Eviction risk in the Fireside neighborhood of Fairburn centers on tract 13121010519, which scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 3,605 residents. It lands near the 83rd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 65% of renter households, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,302 a month against an average household income of $83,152 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 41% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27%Stable renters 14%Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,422
Renter share41.4%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate14.7%
Median income$83,152
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#2 of 3 tracts In Fireside
Moderate
Within parent city
100th percentile
#1 of 4 tracts In Fairburn
Very High
Within county
60th percentile
#132 of 327 tracts In Fulton County
Elevated
Within state
49th percentile
#1,413 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fairburn and the region
Centroid at 33.5679, -84.5974 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fireside scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fairburn
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
14.7% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,302 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fairburn
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fairburn
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fairburn
6.8
How Fireside compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 43
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
49%Socioeconomic
43%Household composition
91%Racial/ethnic minority
20%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
1,449Total filings 2020-21
19.1Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
25.2%Housing insecurity
17.2%Utility-shutoff threat
29.1%Food insecurity
26.1%SNAP enrollment
15.0%Transit barriers
14.7%No health insurance
19.1%Frequent mental distress
33.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fireside
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fairburn, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Fulton County average of 5.7 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 43rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 25.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 17.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 13121010519
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13121010519?
Census tract 13121010519 in the Fireside neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13121010519?
Median gross rent is $1,302/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13121010519?
14.7% of residents in tract 13121010519 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,605.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13121010519?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 49th, household 43th, minority 91th, housing 20th.
Q5
Is tract 13121010519 considered part of Fireside?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13121010519 fall within Fireside (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13121010519 struggle to pay rent?
About 25.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13121010519 compare to Fairburn overall?
Tract 13121010519 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Fairburn at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fairburn; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fairburn
Top eight tracts in Fairburn ranked by composite eviction-risk score.