Neighborhood · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally
Cooper Lakes Eviction Risk: Lower , Grayson
Tract 13135050745 ·
Gwinnett County, GA · pop 4,144 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
How risky is Cooper Lakes in Grayson for landlords? Census tract 13135050745 scores 5.5/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 58% of US census tracts.
43% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,731 monthly, set against $84,031 in average yearly household income, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 46% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20%Stable renters 26%Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units1,593
Renter share46.0%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$84,031
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Cooper Lakes
Moderate
Within parent city
100th percentile
#1 of 4 tracts In Grayson
Very High
Within county
40th percentile
#133 of 220 tracts In Gwinnett County
Low
Within state
23th percentile
#2,156 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Grayson and the region
Centroid at 33.9012, -83.9718 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cooper Lakes scores 2.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Grayson
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,731 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Grayson
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Grayson
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Grayson
3.6
How Cooper Lakes compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 51
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
35%Socioeconomic
66%Household composition
81%Racial/ethnic minority
45%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
1,063Total filings 2020-21
14.0Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.4%Housing insecurity
8.0%Utility-shutoff threat
14.6%Food insecurity
10.3%SNAP enrollment
7.9%Transit barriers
11.8%No health insurance
15.3%Frequent mental distress
25.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cooper Lakes
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 5.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Grayson, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Gwinnett County average of 5.8 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 51st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 13.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13135050745
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050745?
Census tract 13135050745 in the Cooper Lakes neighborhood scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13135050745?
Median gross rent is $1,731/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050745?
6.9% of residents in tract 13135050745 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,144.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050745?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 35th, household 66th, minority 81th, housing 45th.
Q5
Is tract 13135050745 considered part of Cooper Lakes?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13135050745 fall within Cooper Lakes (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13135050745 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13135050745 compare to Grayson overall?
Tract 13135050745 scores 2.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Grayson at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Grayson; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Grayson
Top eight tracts in Grayson ranked by composite eviction-risk score.