Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally
Twin Lakes Eviction Risk: Lower , Hoschton
Tract 13157010106 · Jackson County, GA · pop 3,931 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 13157010106 covers part of the Twin Lakes area of Hoschton, GA, and scores 3.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,931. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 8.6/10.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,678
Renter share21.3%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate14.3%
Median income$92,225
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
56
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
42
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hoschton and the region
Centroid at 34.0948, -83.7501 · click any tract to drill in
Why Twin Lakes scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Hoschton
3.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.1
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
14.3% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,214 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hoschton
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hoschton
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hoschton
5.0
How Twin Lakes compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 36%Socioeconomic
- 51%Household composition
- 30%Racial/ethnic minority
- 25%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.0%Housing insecurity
- 7.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.8%Food insecurity
- 11.2%SNAP enrollment
- 8.0%Transit barriers
- 12.7%No health insurance
- 17.3%Frequent mental distress
- 29.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Twin Lakes
Against Jackson County at 38.4%, 28% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running cool, state political climate reads 2/10.
On the softer side, regional political climate reads 2.1/10. The voucher gap is 16.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
On the national scale it lands near the 33rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 21% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.8/10.
Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $92,225, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
It tracks the Jackson County average of 3.7 closely. Average gross rent is $1,214, close to the Hoschton average.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 13157010106
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13157010106?
Census tract 13157010106 in the Twin Lakes neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13157010106?
Median gross rent is $1,214/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13157010106?
14.3% of residents in tract 13157010106 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,931.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13157010106?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 51th, minority 30th, housing 25th.
Q5
Is tract 13157010106 considered part of Twin Lakes?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13157010106 fall within Twin Lakes (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13157010106 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13157010106 compare to Hoschton overall?
Tract 13157010106 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Hoschton at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hoschton; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related