Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally
Ucon Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 16019970300 · Bonneville County, ID · pop 7,213 · 22% of tract blocks fall in Ucon
With a score of 3.2/10, tract 16019970300 in Ucon, ID reads lower for landlord eviction risk. The clearest offset is state political climate at 1.5/10.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 3%
Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units2,301
Renter share5.6%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate12.4%
Median income$92,743
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
48
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
43
th percentile
Moderate
National
25
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Ucon and the region
Centroid at 43.6049, -111.9338 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ucon scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Ucon
2.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
Idaho legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
12.4% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$933 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ucon
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ucon
3.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ucon
6.3
How Ucon compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 32%Socioeconomic
- 57%Household composition
- 15%Racial/ethnic minority
- 14%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.6%Housing insecurity
- 6.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.3%Food insecurity
- 8.0%SNAP enrollment
- 6.9%Transit barriers
- 8.9%No health insurance
- 16.5%Frequent mental distress
- 33.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Ucon
The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.4/10. Cost burden runs 42% here against 32.8% across Bonneville County.
Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10. SNAP participation runs 8.0% against 15.2% nationally.
On the national scale it lands near the 25th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 6% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
Social vulnerability reads 3.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $92,743, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
It tracks the Bonneville County average of 3.5 closely. Average gross rent is $933, close to the Ucon average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 16019970300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 16019970300?
Census tract 16019970300 in Ucon scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 16019970300?
Median gross rent is $933/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 16019970300?
12.4% of residents in tract 16019970300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,213.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 16019970300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 32th, household 57th, minority 15th, housing 14th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 16019970300 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 16019970300 compare to Ucon overall?
Tract 16019970300 scores 3.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Ucon at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ucon; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related