Sheridan Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago
Tract 17031031700 · Cook County, IL · pop 6,119 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
With a score of 6.5/10, tract 17031031700 in the Sheridan Park area of Chicago, IL reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. The score leans hardest on local political climate at 8.5/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.9654, -87.6632 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sheridan Park scores 6.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Sheridan Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 40
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 44%Socioeconomic
- 3%Household composition
- 50%Racial/ethnic minority
- 85%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,324Total filings over 15 yrs
- 3.38%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.1%Peak (2001)
- 59Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.7%Housing insecurity
- 6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.9%Food insecurity
- 8.4%SNAP enrollment
- 6.3%Transit barriers
- 6.7%No health insurance
- 14.7%Frequent mental distress
- 18.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Sheridan Park
The severe-burden share is 18%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.
Disability prevalence runs 18.1% against 31.5% nationally. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.1/10.
Against Cook County at 45.6%, 39% of renters here are cost-burdened. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,324 filings here across 15 tracked years. Average gross rent is $1,249, 13% below the Chicago average.
Filings peaked in 2001 at 5.1% of renter households. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 3.4% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 82% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 1.4 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
It tracks the Cook County average of 6.1 closely.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 17031031700
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031031700?
What is the average rent in tract 17031031700?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031031700?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031031700?
Is tract 17031031700 considered part of Sheridan Park?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031031700?
What share of households in tract 17031031700 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031031700 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031031700 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.