Tract 17031680900 ·
Cook County, IL · pop 3,560 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Census tract 17031680900 covers part of the Becks Park area of Chicago, IL, and scores 8.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,560. Set annual rent against average income of $18,333 and the ratio lands at 65%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 44%Stable renters 48%Owners 8%
Tract context
Occupied units1,840
Renter share92.7%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate38.1%
Median income$18,333
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
11th percentile
#9 of 10 tracts In Becks Park
Very Low
Within parent city
68th percentile
#256 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Elevated
Within county
85th percentile
#202 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
High
Within state
100th percentile
#5 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7764, -87.6376 · click any tract to drill in
Why Becks Park scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
38.1% poverty · this tract
9.5
Supply constraint
$991 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Becks Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
100%Socioeconomic
74%Household composition
98%Racial/ethnic minority
66%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
100%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
1,433Total filings over 15 yrs
6.87%Avg annual filing rate
10.6%Peak (2001)
90Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2015
Filings dropped 43% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Becks Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
42.4%Housing insecurity
32.6%Utility-shutoff threat
57.4%Food insecurity
64.5%SNAP enrollment
28.3%Transit barriers
18.0%No health insurance
22.5%Frequent mental distress
47.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Becks Park
SNAP participation runs 64.5% against 15.2% nationally. The score leans hardest on economic stress at 9.5/10.
This is renter territory: 93% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. The poverty rate is 38%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10.
Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. At $991 a month, rents run 31% under what the rest of Chicago commands.
Disability prevalence runs 47.1% against 31.5% nationally. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10. 17% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,433 filings here across 15 tracked years.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031680900
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031680900?
Census tract 17031680900 in the Becks Park neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031680900?
Median gross rent is $991/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031680900?
38.1% of residents in tract 17031680900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,560.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031680900?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 100th, household 74th, minority 98th, housing 66th.
Q5
Is tract 17031680900 considered part of Becks Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031680900 fall within Becks Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031680900?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,433 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031680900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.87% of renter households, peaking at 10.6% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031680900 struggle to pay rent?
About 42.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 32.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031680900 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031680900 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031680900 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 100% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.