Within neighborhood
33
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally
Graceland West Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chicago
Tract 17031050100 · Cook County, IL · pop 2,513 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
17031050100 is a census tract in the Graceland West area of Chicago, IL. It scores 5.3/10 for landlords. It is home to 2,513 residents. Against Cook County at 45.6%, 27% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 45%
Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units1,156
Renter share61.9%
SVI overall0.05
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$114,063
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
12
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
34
th percentile
Low
Within state
59
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.9578, -87.6764 · click any tract to drill in
Why Graceland West scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,700 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Graceland West compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 5
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 13%Socioeconomic
- 2%Household composition
- 22%Racial/ethnic minority
- 28%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 62Total filings over 15 yrs
- 0.54%Avg annual filing rate
- 0.8%Peak (2003)
- 3Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Graceland West. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.7%Housing insecurity
- 5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.5%Food insecurity
- 6.5%SNAP enrollment
- 5.1%Transit barriers
- 5.9%No health insurance
- 14.5%Frequent mental distress
- 17.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Graceland West
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Disability prevalence runs 17.2% against 31.5% nationally.
Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. At $1,700 a month, rents run 18% over what the rest of Chicago commands. SNAP participation runs 6.5% against 15.2% nationally.
The filing record is not thin: 62 evictions over 15 years of observation. It sits 0.8 points below the Cook County average of 6.1.
Filings peaked in 2003 at 0.8% of renter households. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 0.5% of renter households face a filing.
Nationally it ranks #28,095 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031050100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031050100?
Census tract 17031050100 in the Graceland West neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031050100?
Median gross rent is $1,700/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031050100?
3.6% of residents in tract 17031050100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,513.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031050100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 5th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 2th, minority 22th, housing 28th.
Q5
Is tract 17031050100 considered part of Graceland West?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031050100 fall within Graceland West (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031050100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 62 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031050100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.54% of renter households, peaking at 0.8% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031050100 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031050100 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031050100 scores 5.3/10, lower than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031050100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
South Lynn
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
North Kenwood
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Mayfair
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Homan Square
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Park Manor
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Rosemoor
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
South Brighton
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Becks Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Related