Neighborhood · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally
Schorsch Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chicago
Tract 17031170200 ·
Cook County, IL · pop 3,752 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Census tract 17031170200 covers part of the Schorsch area of Chicago, IL, and scores 5.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,752 residents. Severe burden reaches 44%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%Stable renters 10%Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,293
Renter share18.6%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate5.7%
Median income$90,625
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
43th percentile
#5 of 8 tracts In Schorsch
Moderate
Within parent city
22th percentile
#616 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Low
Within county
42th percentile
#773 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Moderate
Within state
70th percentile
#994 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.9494, -87.7815 · click any tract to drill in
Why Schorsch scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
5.7% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,257 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Schorsch compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 48
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
33%Socioeconomic
65%Household composition
66%Racial/ethnic minority
47%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
87%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
12.9%Housing insecurity
6.5%Utility-shutoff threat
14.8%Food insecurity
10.5%SNAP enrollment
7.0%Transit barriers
12.1%No health insurance
13.8%Frequent mental distress
24.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Schorsch
The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.4/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.5/10.
On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. Court records carry 94 eviction filings across 15 observed years.
At $1,257 a month, rents run 13% under what the rest of Chicago commands. The worst year on record was 2012, when 3.7% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 2.2% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #20,506 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 19% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $90,625, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031170200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031170200?
Census tract 17031170200 in the Schorsch neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031170200?
Median gross rent is $1,257/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031170200?
5.7% of residents in tract 17031170200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,752.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031170200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 65th, minority 66th, housing 47th.
Q5
Is tract 17031170200 considered part of Schorsch?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031170200 fall within Schorsch (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031170200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 94 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031170200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.18% of renter households, peaking at 3.7% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031170200 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031170200 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031170200 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031170200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.