Roseland Heights Eviction Risk: High , Chicago
Tract 17031490700 · Cook County, IL · pop 2,459 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
With a score of 8.1/10, tract 17031490700 in the Roseland Heights area of Chicago, IL reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,459. 66% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7107, -87.6284 · click any tract to drill in
Why Roseland Heights scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Roseland Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 65
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 84%Socioeconomic
- 73%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 9%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 212Total filings over 15 yrs
- 6.43%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.0%Peak (2015)
- 24Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Roseland Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 31.0%Housing insecurity
- 22.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 40.8%Food insecurity
- 44.4%SNAP enrollment
- 19.1%Transit barriers
- 12.0%No health insurance
- 18.4%Frequent mental distress
- 39.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Roseland Heights
Against Cook County at 45.6%, around two-thirds of renters here are cost-burdened. Food insecurity runs 40.8% against 17.8% nationally. What pushes it up most is local political climate at 8.5/10.
It sits 2.0 points above the Cook County average of 6.1. Annualized rent equals 35% of average household income of $42,083, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. The poverty rate is 31%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.9/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 22.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.
Average gross rent is $1,219, 15% below the Chicago average. Court records carry 212 eviction filings across 15 observed years. The worst year on record was 2015, when 9.0% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 6.4% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 17031490700
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031490700?
What is the average rent in tract 17031490700?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031490700?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031490700?
Is tract 17031490700 considered part of Roseland Heights?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031490700?
What share of households in tract 17031490700 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031490700 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031490700 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.