Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,382 of 84,120 nationally
Rosemoor Eviction Risk: High , Chicago
Tract 17031490902 · Cook County, IL · pop 4,697 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Census tract 17031490902 covers part of the Rosemoor area of Chicago, IL, and scores 8.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,697. Severe burden reaches 39%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%
Stable renters 17%
Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units1,845
Renter share37.7%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate26.4%
Median income$69,471
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
86
th percentile
High
Within county
89
th percentile
High
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7033, -87.6153 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rosemoor scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
26.4% poverty · this tract
6.6
Supply constraint
$1,102 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Rosemoor compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 63
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 69%Socioeconomic
- 42%Household composition
- 100%Racial/ethnic minority
- 40%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 60%Grade B
- 34%Grade C
- 5%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 612Total filings over 15 yrs
- 4.73%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.2%Peak (2001)
- 37Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 26% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rosemoor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 25.0%Housing insecurity
- 16.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 31.1%Food insecurity
- 31.8%SNAP enrollment
- 14.8%Transit barriers
- 9.5%No health insurance
- 16.6%Frequent mental distress
- 34.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rosemoor
Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1.3/10. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points.
Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Cost burden runs 55% here against 45.6% across Cook County. The poverty rate is 26%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Food insecurity runs 31.1% against 17.8% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,102, 23% below the Chicago average.
On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 612 filings here across 15 tracked years.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 16.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The worst year on record was 2001, when 5.2% of renter households were served.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031490902
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031490902?
Census tract 17031490902 in the Rosemoor neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031490902?
Median gross rent is $1,102/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031490902?
26.4% of residents in tract 17031490902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,697.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031490902?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 42th, minority 100th, housing 40th.
Q5
Is tract 17031490902 considered part of Rosemoor?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031490902 fall within Rosemoor (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031490902?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 612 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031490902 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.73% of renter households, peaking at 5.2% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031490902 struggle to pay rent?
About 25.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031490902 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031490902 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031490902 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 5% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
Central Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Fifth City
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
North Kenwood
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Cheltenham
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
South Brighton
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
South Lynn
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Oakwood Shores
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Mayfair
8.1
/ 10 · High
Related