Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Historic Palos Eviction Risk: Lower , Palos Park

Tract 17031823901 · Cook County, IL · pop 4,020 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

17031823901 is a census tract in the Historic Palos area of Palos Park, IL. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,020 residents. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 3.1 points.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 2% Owners 98%
Tract context
Occupied units1,646
Renter share2.1%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate4.2%
Median income$118,778

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Historic Palos
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Palos Park
Moderate
Within county
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#1,314 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Very Low
Within state
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#2,873 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Palos Park and the region

Centroid at 41.6691, -87.8380 · click any tract to drill in

Why Historic Palos scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Palos Park
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
4.2% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Palos Park
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Palos Park
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Palos Park
4.8

How Historic Palos compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Historic Palos risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 823901Palos Park: 4.04.0Palos Parkparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 50Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 6.59%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.9%Peak (2009)
  • 6Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170318239012001: 3 filings (10.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 3 filings (10.00/100 renter HHs)2004: 2 filings (6.67/100 renter HHs)2005: 1 filings (2.27/100 renter HHs)2006: 3 filings (6.82/100 renter HHs)2007: 3 filings (6.82/100 renter HHs)2008: 3 filings (6.82/100 renter HHs)2009: 7 filings (15.91/100 renter HHs)2010: 1 filings (1.41/100 renter HHs)2011: 5 filings (5.32/100 renter HHs)2012: 5 filings (5.32/100 renter HHs)2013: 4 filings (4.26/100 renter HHs)2014: 4 filings (4.26/100 renter HHs)2015: 6 filings (6.38/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 100% over the past 15 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Historic Palos

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.1/10. Running hot, regional political climate reads 7.5/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 50 filings here across 14 tracked years.

Food insecurity runs 9.6% against 17.8% nationally. Well under the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 2.9/10. SNAP participation runs 8.0% against 15.2% nationally.

The worst year on record was 2009, when 15.9% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 6.6% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 2% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.5/10. Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 2.1 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031823901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031823901?

Census tract 17031823901 in the Historic Palos neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031823901?

4.2% of residents in tract 17031823901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,020.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031823901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 43th, minority 26th, housing 12th.
Q4

Is tract 17031823901 considered part of Historic Palos?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031823901 fall within Historic Palos (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031823901?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 50 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 17031823901 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.59% of renter households, peaking at 15.9% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 17031823901 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 17031823901 compare to Palos Park overall?

Tract 17031823901 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Palos Park at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Palos Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Palos Park

Top eight tracts in Palos Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related