Hollywood Eviction Risk: Elevated , Brookfield
Tract 17031828100 · Cook County, IL · pop 5,388 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
With a score of 7.3/10, tract 17031828100 in the Hollywood area of Lansing, IL reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,388. At $1,984 a month, rents run 56% over what the rest of Lansing commands.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Brookfield and the region
Centroid at 41.5634, -87.5356 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hollywood scores 7.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Hollywood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 68
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 81%Socioeconomic
- 88%Household composition
- 77%Racial/ethnic minority
- 14%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 1%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 179Total filings over 15 yrs
- 4.26%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.8%Peak (2012)
- 20Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Hollywood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 20.5%Housing insecurity
- 12.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 25.5%Food insecurity
- 24.8%SNAP enrollment
- 12.0%Transit barriers
- 12.4%No health insurance
- 17.1%Frequent mental distress
- 31.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Hollywood
Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Annualized rent equals 37% of average household income of $64,782, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. What pushes it up most is local political climate at 7.8/10.
Cost burden runs 55% here against 45.6% across Cook County. The poverty rate is 24%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Running hot, regional political climate reads 7.5/10.
It sits 1.2 points above the Cook County average of 6.1. SNAP participation runs 24.8% against 15.2% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 179 evictions over 15 years of observation.
Food insecurity runs 25.5% against 17.8% nationally. The voucher gap is 12.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
The worst year on record was 2012, when 7.8% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 4.3% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 17031828100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031828100?
What is the average rent in tract 17031828100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031828100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031828100?
Is tract 17031828100 considered part of Hollywood?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031828100?
What share of households in tract 17031828100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031828100 compare to Brookfield overall?
Was tract 17031828100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Brookfield
Top eight tracts in Brookfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.