Becks Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago
Tract 17031834800 · Cook County, IL · pop 1,683 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 17031834800 covers the Becks Park area of Chicago, home to 1,683 residents. For landlords it grades 6.2/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than about 81% of US census tracts.
About 40% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $608 a month while the average household earns $21,636 a year, roughly 34% of income at the averages. Renters make up 75% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7836, -87.6451 · click any tract to drill in
Why Becks Park scores 7.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Becks Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 97%Socioeconomic
- 85%Household composition
- 98%Racial/ethnic minority
- 82%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 100%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 694Total filings over 15 yrs
- 9.30%Avg annual filing rate
- 14.3%Peak (2002)
- 46Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Becks Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 34.6%Housing insecurity
- 24.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 45.7%Food insecurity
- 49.7%SNAP enrollment
- 21.4%Transit barriers
- 14.6%No health insurance
- 19.9%Frequent mental distress
- 40.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Becks Park
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chicago eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Cook County average of 5.7 and above the Illinois statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 96th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 34.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 24.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 17031834800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031834800?
What is the average rent in tract 17031834800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031834800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031834800?
Is tract 17031834800 considered part of Becks Park?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031834800?
What share of households in tract 17031834800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031834800 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031834800 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.