Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,382 of 84,120 nationally

Chinatown Eviction Risk: High , Chicago

Tract 17031841100 · Cook County, IL · pop 6,990 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 17031841100 covers part of the Chinatown area of Chicago, IL, and scores 8.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,990 residents. At $852 a month, rents run 41% under what the rest of Chicago commands.

Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 32% Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units2,952
Renter share58.4%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate19.3%
Median income$43,527

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Chinatown
Very Low
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#197 of 792 tracts In Chicago
High
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#265 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chicago and the region

Centroid at 41.8516, -87.6357 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chinatown scores 8.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
19.3% poverty · this tract
4.8
Supply constraint
$852 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5

How Chinatown compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chinatown risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.18.1This tracttract 841100Chicago: 6.76.7Chicagoparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 184Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 0.85%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.3%Peak (2012)
  • 9Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170318411002001: 13 filings (0.92/100 renter HHs)2002: 9 filings (0.64/100 renter HHs)2003: 8 filings (0.56/100 renter HHs)2004: 14 filings (0.99/100 renter HHs)2005: 13 filings (0.99/100 renter HHs)2006: 9 filings (0.69/100 renter HHs)2007: 18 filings (1.38/100 renter HHs)2008: 10 filings (0.77/100 renter HHs)2009: 14 filings (1.07/100 renter HHs)2010: 15 filings (0.95/100 renter HHs)2011: 13 filings (0.82/100 renter HHs)2012: 21 filings (1.32/100 renter HHs)2013: 12 filings (0.76/100 renter HHs)2014: 6 filings (0.38/100 renter HHs)2015: 9 filings (0.57/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 31% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Chinatown. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chinatown

The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1/10. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Food insecurity runs 31.6% against 17.8% nationally. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.

The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. 11% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Court records carry 184 eviction filings across 15 observed years.

SNAP participation runs 23.1% against 15.2% nationally. Filings peaked in 2012 at 1.3% of renter households.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 0.9% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 91% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 3.0 points hotter.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031841100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031841100?

Census tract 17031841100 in the Chinatown neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031841100?

Median gross rent is $852/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031841100?

19.3% of residents in tract 17031841100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,990.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031841100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 86th, household 97th, minority 90th, housing 61th.
Q5

Is tract 17031841100 considered part of Chinatown?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031841100 fall within Chinatown (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031841100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 184 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031841100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.85% of renter households, peaking at 1.3% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 17031841100 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 17031841100 compare to Chicago overall?

Tract 17031841100 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 17031841100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 71% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chicago

Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related