Chinatown Eviction Risk: High , Chicago
Tract 17031841100 · Cook County, IL · pop 6,990 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 17031841100 covers part of the Chinatown area of Chicago, IL, and scores 8.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,990 residents. At $852 a month, rents run 41% under what the rest of Chicago commands.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.8516, -87.6357 · click any tract to drill in
Why Chinatown scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Chinatown compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 91
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 86%Socioeconomic
- 97%Household composition
- 90%Racial/ethnic minority
- 61%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 71%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 184Total filings over 15 yrs
- 0.85%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.3%Peak (2012)
- 9Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Chinatown. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.4%Housing insecurity
- 8.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 31.6%Food insecurity
- 23.1%SNAP enrollment
- 11.4%Transit barriers
- 13.4%No health insurance
- 13.2%Frequent mental distress
- 31.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Chinatown
The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1/10. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Food insecurity runs 31.6% against 17.8% nationally. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.
The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. 11% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Court records carry 184 eviction filings across 15 observed years.
SNAP participation runs 23.1% against 15.2% nationally. Filings peaked in 2012 at 1.3% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 0.9% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 91% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 3.0 points hotter.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 17031841100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031841100?
What is the average rent in tract 17031841100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031841100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031841100?
Is tract 17031841100 considered part of Chinatown?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031841100?
What share of households in tract 17031841100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031841100 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031841100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.