Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally
Long Lake Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 17097860905 · Lake County, IL · pop 5,588 · 31% of tract blocks fall in Long Lake
Census tract 17097860905 covers part of Long Lake, IL, and scores 5.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. 21% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Lake County average of 42.6%.
Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 19%
Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,852
Renter share24.4%
SVI overall0.37
Poverty rate11.1%
Median income$90,833
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
67
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
54
th percentile
Moderate
National
65
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Long Lake and the region
Centroid at 42.3829, -88.1407 · click any tract to drill in
Why Long Lake scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Long Lake
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
11.1% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,137 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Lake
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Lake
6.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Lake
4.6
How Long Lake compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 37
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 56%Socioeconomic
- 32%Household composition
- 48%Racial/ethnic minority
- 20%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.1%Housing insecurity
- 7.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.8%Food insecurity
- 13.9%SNAP enrollment
- 8.0%Transit barriers
- 10.8%No health insurance
- 17.0%Frequent mental distress
- 28.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Long Lake
The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1.5/10. Average gross rent is $1,137, 26% below the Long Lake average. The severe-burden share is 13%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Running cool, economic stress reads 2.8/10. Against the Lake County average of 4.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.8 points. On the national scale it lands near the 65th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 24% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.3/10. Against average income of $90,833, annual rent is just 15%.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 17097860905
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17097860905?
Census tract 17097860905 in Long Lake scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17097860905?
Median gross rent is $1,137/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17097860905?
11.1% of residents in tract 17097860905 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,588.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17097860905?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 37th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 32th, minority 48th, housing 20th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 17097860905 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 17097860905 compare to Long Lake overall?
Tract 17097860905 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Long Lake at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Long Lake
Top eight tracts in Long Lake ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related