Neighborhood · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally
Chinatown Eviction Risk: Lower , Maryville
Tract 17119403533 ·
Madison County, IL · pop 10,799 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
The Chinatown area of Maryville anchors census tract 17119403533, which lands at 4.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #68,680 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
20% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,190 monthly, set against $107,592 in average yearly household income, roughly 13% of income at the averages. Renters make up 19% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%Stable renters 15%Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units4,439
Renter share18.7%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate4.5%
Median income$107,592
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Chinatown
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Maryville
Moderate
Within county
7th percentile
#59 of 63 tracts In Madison County
Very Low
Within state
15th percentile
#2,768 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Maryville and the region
Centroid at 38.7305, -89.9476 · click any tract to drill in
Why Chinatown scores 1.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Maryville
4.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
4.5% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,190 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Maryville
3.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Maryville
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Maryville
2.7
How Chinatown compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 16
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
17%Socioeconomic
22%Household composition
26%Racial/ethnic minority
30%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
149Total filings over 11 yrs
2.88%Avg annual filing rate
5.3%Peak (2008)
20Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year2004 to 2015
Filings climbed 43% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
7.9%Housing insecurity
4.8%Utility-shutoff threat
8.5%Food insecurity
7.1%SNAP enrollment
5.0%Transit barriers
5.1%No health insurance
14.7%Frequent mental distress
26.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Chinatown
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 5.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Maryville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Madison County average of 5.6 and below the Illinois statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 149 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 2.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.3% of renter households in 2008.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 16th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 17119403533
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17119403533?
Census tract 17119403533 in the Chinatown neighborhood scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17119403533?
Median gross rent is $1,190/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 20% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17119403533?
4.5% of residents in tract 17119403533 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 10,799.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17119403533?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 22th, minority 26th, housing 30th.
Q5
Is tract 17119403533 considered part of Chinatown?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17119403533 fall within Chinatown (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17119403533?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 149 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 17119403533 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.88% of renter households, peaking at 5.3% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17119403533 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17119403533 compare to Maryville overall?
Tract 17119403533 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Maryville at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Maryville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.