Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally

Cedar Shores Eviction Risk: Lower , Leo-Cedarville

Tract 18003010201 · Allen County, IN · pop 7,530 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

The Cedar Shores area of Leo-Cedarville is where census tract 18003010201 sits, home to 7,530 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 4.6/10. That is riskier than about 26% of US census tracts.

42% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 42% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,036 monthly, set against $116,277 in average yearly household income, roughly 11% of income at the averages. Renters make up 4% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 2% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units2,543
Renter share4.2%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate5.8%
Median income$116,277

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Cedar Shores
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Leo-Cedarville
Very Low
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#94 of 96 tracts In Allen County
Very Low
Within state
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#1,592 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Leo-Cedarville and the region

Centroid at 41.2263, -85.0507 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cedar Shores scores 1.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Leo-Cedarville
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
5.8% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,036 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Leo-Cedarville
1.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Leo-Cedarville
2.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Leo-Cedarville
1.9

How Cedar Shores compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cedar Shores risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.71.7This tracttract 010201Leo-Cedarville: 2.22.2Leo-Cedarvilleparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 17Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 5.38%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.6%Peak (2018)
  • 12Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cedar Shores

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 3.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Leo-Cedarville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Allen County average of 4.6 and in line with the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 1st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 18003010201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18003010201?

Census tract 18003010201 in the Cedar Shores neighborhood scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18003010201?

Median gross rent is $1,036/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18003010201?

5.8% of residents in tract 18003010201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,530.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18003010201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 14th, minority 12th, housing 1th.
Q5

Is tract 18003010201 considered part of Cedar Shores?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18003010201 fall within Cedar Shores (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 18003010201?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 17 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 18003010201 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.38% of renter households, peaking at 7.6% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18003010201 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18003010201 compare to Leo-Cedarville overall?

Tract 18003010201 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Leo-Cedarville at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Leo-Cedarville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Leo-Cedarville

Top eight tracts in Leo-Cedarville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related