Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,882 of 84,120 nationally

Pulaski Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Hammond

Tract 18089020300 · Lake County, IN · pop 5,396 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

With a score of 4.7/10, tract 18089020300 in the Pulaski Park area of Hammond, IN reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,396 residents. Against Lake County at 43.0%, 11% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 20% Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units2,179
Renter share23.0%
SVI overall0.78
Poverty rate15.8%
Median income$55,371

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Pulaski Park
Moderate
Within parent city
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#8 of 19 tracts In Hammond
Elevated
Within county
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#58 of 131 tracts In Lake County
Elevated
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#340 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hammond and the region

Centroid at 41.6561, -87.5111 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pulaski Park scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hammond
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
15.8% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$1,027 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hammond
6.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hammond
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hammond
7.3

How Pulaski Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pulaski Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.7This tracttract 0203004.0Hammondparent city4.4Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 78

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pulaski Park

Pulling hardest the other way is eviction-process difficulty at 1.7/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2/10. Food insecurity runs 29.5% against 17.8% nationally.

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.8/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. At $1,027 a month, rents run 9% under what the rest of Hammond commands.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 55% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 23% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the IN average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.8 points hotter.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 18089020300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18089020300?

Census tract 18089020300 in the Pulaski Park neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18089020300?

Median gross rent is $1,027/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 11% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18089020300?

15.8% of residents in tract 18089020300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,396.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18089020300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 79th, minority 74th, housing 63th.
Q5

Is tract 18089020300 considered part of Pulaski Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18089020300 fall within Pulaski Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 18089020300 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 18089020300 compare to Hammond overall?

Tract 18089020300 scores 4.7/10, higher than the parent city of Hammond at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hammond eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 18089020300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 20% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hammond

Top eight tracts in Hammond ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related