Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,850 of 84,120 nationally

Historic Ransom Place Eviction Risk: Moderate , Indianapolis

Tract 18097356400 · Marion County, IN · pop 4,244 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 18097356400 runs through Historic Ransom Place in Indianapolis city (balance). With 4,244 residents, it scores 6.1/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 78% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 47% of renter households, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,115 monthly, set against $42,847 in average yearly household income, roughly 31% of income at the averages. Renters make up 73% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 39% Owners 26%
Tract context
Occupied units1,775
Renter share73.5%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate35.2%
Median income$42,847

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Historic Ransom Place
Moderate
Within parent city
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 231 tracts In Indianapolis
High
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#25 of 253 tracts In Marion County
Very High
Within state
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#97 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Indianapolis and the region

Centroid at 39.7653, -86.1846 · click any tract to drill in

Why Historic Ransom Place scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
35.2% poverty · this tract
8.8
Supply constraint
$1,115 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Indianapolis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8

How Historic Ransom Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Historic Ransom Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.65.6This tracttract 356400Indianapolis: 2.72.7Indianapolisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 664Total filings 2020-21
  • 8.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 8.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.97×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 9 filings (0.88× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-03-01: 9 filings (1.29× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2020-08-01: 11 filings (0.88× baseline)2020-09-01: 11 filings (0.94× baseline)2020-10-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 12 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.49× baseline)2021-02-01: 6 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-04-01: 14 filings (1.47× baseline)2021-05-01: 9 filings (0.90× baseline)2021-06-01: 13 filings (1.58× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-09-01: 9 filings (0.77× baseline)2021-10-01: 12 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 8 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-12-01: 10 filings (1.05× baseline)2022-01-01: 16 filings (1.56× baseline)2022-02-01: 8 filings (0.97× baseline)2022-03-01: 12 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-04-01: 11 filings (1.16× baseline)2022-05-01: 13 filings (1.30× baseline)2022-06-01: 8 filings (0.97× baseline)2022-07-01: 8 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-08-01: 11 filings (0.88× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (0.51× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 17 filings (1.89× baseline)2022-12-01: 8 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-01-01: 11 filings (1.07× baseline)2023-02-01: 8 filings (0.97× baseline)2023-03-01: 12 filings (1.71× baseline)2023-04-01: 11 filings (1.16× baseline)2023-05-01: 15 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-06-01: 12 filings (1.45× baseline)2023-07-01: 10 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (0.34× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (0.78× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-01-01: 9 filings (0.88× baseline)2024-02-01: 7 filings (0.85× baseline)2024-03-01: 7 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 6 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-06-01: 20 filings (2.42× baseline)2024-07-01: 10 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (0.48× baseline)2024-09-01: 9 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-10-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2024-11-01: 10 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-12-01: 27 filings (2.84× baseline)2025-01-01: 11 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-03-01: 13 filings (1.86× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-06-01: 11 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 11 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-08-01: 8 filings (0.64× baseline)2025-09-01: 11 filings (0.94× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2025-11-01: 12 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-12-01: 11 filings (1.16× baseline)2026-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Indianapolis, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Historic Ransom Place

What moves this score most is economic stress at 8.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Marion County average of 5.4 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.97x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 86th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 18097356400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18097356400?

Census tract 18097356400 in the Historic Ransom Place neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18097356400?

Median gross rent is $1,115/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18097356400?

35.2% of residents in tract 18097356400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,244.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18097356400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 88th, minority 68th, housing 43th.
Q5

Is tract 18097356400 considered part of Historic Ransom Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18097356400 fall within Historic Ransom Place (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18097356400 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.97× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Indianapolis eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18097356400 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18097356400 compare to Indianapolis overall?

Tract 18097356400 scores 5.6/10, higher than the parent city of Indianapolis at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18097356400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 64% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Indianapolis

Top eight tracts in Indianapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related