Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Washington Place Eviction Risk: Lower , Indianapolis

Tract 18097361300 · Marion County, IN · pop 2,210 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Tract 18097361300 covers Washington Place in Indianapolis city (balance) in Indiana. Home to 2,210 residents, it scores 4.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 32% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 27% of renter households, a moderate level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,137 monthly, set against $66,045 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 21% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 16% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units986
Renter share21.4%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate9.7%
Median income$66,045

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Washington Place
Moderate
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#144 of 231 tracts In Indianapolis
Low
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#156 of 253 tracts In Marion County
Low
Within state
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#718 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Indianapolis and the region

Centroid at 39.7667, -86.0358 · click any tract to drill in

Why Washington Place scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
9.7% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,137 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Indianapolis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8

How Washington Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Washington Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 361300Indianapolis: 2.72.7Indianapolisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 394Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 7.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.71×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-02-01: 9 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.18× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-09-01: 7 filings (0.72× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-12-01: 10 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-03-01: 11 filings (1.26× baseline)2022-04-01: 8 filings (1.39× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-06-01: 19 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 10 filings (0.91× baseline)2022-08-01: 9 filings (1.64× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-10-01: 7 filings (1.04× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-12-01: 12 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-01-01: 9 filings (1.13× baseline)2023-02-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.34× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-08-01: 27 filings (4.91× baseline)2023-09-01: 12 filings (1.23× baseline)2023-10-01: 11 filings (1.63× baseline)2023-11-01: 12 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-01-01: 6 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-02-01: 10 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.34× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (1.39× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.42× baseline)2024-07-01: 6 filings (0.55× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (1.09× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-11-01: 16 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-01-01: 11 filings (1.38× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.18× baseline)2025-08-01: 5 filings (0.91× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (0.62× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-12-01: 7 filings (0.93× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Indianapolis, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Washington Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Washington Place

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Marion County average of 5.4 and in line with the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 42nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 18097361300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18097361300?

Census tract 18097361300 in the Washington Place neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18097361300?

Median gross rent is $1,137/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18097361300?

9.7% of residents in tract 18097361300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,210.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18097361300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 53th, household 32th, minority 38th, housing 40th.
Q5

Is tract 18097361300 considered part of Washington Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18097361300 fall within Washington Place (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18097361300 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.71× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Indianapolis eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18097361300 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18097361300 compare to Indianapolis overall?

Tract 18097361300 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Indianapolis at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18097361300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 6% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Indianapolis

Top eight tracts in Indianapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related