Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally
Camp Brosend Eviction Risk: Lower , Newburgh
Tract 18173030703 · Warrick County, IN · pop 6,087 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Census tract 18173030703 covers Camp Brosend in Newburgh, home to 6,087 residents. For landlords it grades 4.5/10, a moderate reading. On the national scale it ranks #64,562 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 70% of renter households, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $990 a month while the average household earns $90,269 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. About 24% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units2,153
Renter share24.2%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate8.9%
Median income$90,269
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
73
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
19
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Newburgh and the region
Centroid at 37.9618, -87.3899 · click any tract to drill in
Why Camp Brosend scores 2.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Newburgh
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
8.9% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$990 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Newburgh
2.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Newburgh
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Newburgh
3.0
How Camp Brosend compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 27
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 28%Socioeconomic
- 61%Household composition
- 19%Racial/ethnic minority
- 23%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.8%Housing insecurity
- 6.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.2%Food insecurity
- 5.7%SNAP enrollment
- 6.1%Transit barriers
- 6.5%No health insurance
- 17.4%Frequent mental distress
- 27.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Camp Brosend
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Newburgh, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Warrick County average of 3.8 and in line with the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 27th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 18173030703
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18173030703?
Census tract 18173030703 in the Camp Brosend neighborhood scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 18173030703?
Median gross rent is $990/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 18173030703?
8.9% of residents in tract 18173030703 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,087.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 18173030703?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 61th, minority 19th, housing 23th.
Q5
Is tract 18173030703 considered part of Camp Brosend?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18173030703 fall within Camp Brosend (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 18173030703 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 18173030703 compare to Newburgh overall?
Tract 18173030703 scores 2.4/10, higher than the parent city of Newburgh at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Newburgh; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Newburgh
Top eight tracts in Newburgh ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related