Census Tract · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally
Cassoday Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 20015020101 ·
Butler County, KS · pop 2,116 · 3% of tract blocks fall in Cassoday
Tract 20015020101, home to 2,116 residents in Cassoday, scores 2.8/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 1% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 0% of renter households, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $936 monthly, set against $70,833 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 14% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%Stable renters 14%Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units930
Renter share13.7%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate12.3%
Median income$70,833
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Cassoday
Moderate
Within county
61th percentile
#8 of 19 tracts In Butler County
Elevated
Within state
40th percentile
#497 of 829 tracts In Kansas
Moderate
National
31th percentile
#58,384 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cassoday and the region
Centroid at 37.9662, -96.7632 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cassoday scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cassoday
3.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.9
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
12.3% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$936 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cassoday
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cassoday
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cassoday
2.0
How Cassoday compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 16
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.1%Housing insecurity
6.7%Utility-shutoff threat
10.7%Food insecurity
6.0%SNAP enrollment
5.9%Transit barriers
7.4%No health insurance
16.1%Frequent mental distress
32.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cassoday
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 4.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cassoday, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Butler County average of 4.3 and below the Kansas statewide average of 4.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 16th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 20015020101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20015020101?
Census tract 20015020101 in Cassoday scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 20015020101?
Median gross rent is $936/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 20015020101?
12.3% of residents in tract 20015020101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,116.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 20015020101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 29th, minority 8th, housing 16th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 20015020101 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 20015020101 compare to Cassoday overall?
Tract 20015020101 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of Cassoday at 1.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cassoday; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.