Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
California Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Thomas
Tract 21037052302 · Campbell County, KY · pop 4,979 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 21037052302 in the California area of Fort Thomas, KY reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,979. The severe-burden share is 32%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12%
Stable renters 18%
Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,998
Renter share30.2%
SVI overall0.20
Poverty rate6.2%
Median income$103,500
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
17
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
27
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fort Thomas and the region
Centroid at 39.0749, -84.4515 · click any tract to drill in
Why California scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fort Thomas
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
Kentucky legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
6.2% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,097 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Thomas
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Thomas
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Thomas
3.7
How California compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 20
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 26%Socioeconomic
- 52%Household composition
- 18%Racial/ethnic minority
- 15%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 34%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within California. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in California
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.5/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.1/10.
Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.2/10. It sits 1.0 points below the Campbell County average of 4.0.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 2.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $103,500, annual rent is just 13%. Statewide the KY average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. 39% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. Average gross rent is $1,097, close to the Fort Thomas average.
30% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 21037052302
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 21037052302?
Census tract 21037052302 in the California neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 21037052302?
Median gross rent is $1,097/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 21037052302?
6.2% of residents in tract 21037052302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,979.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 21037052302?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 20th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 52th, minority 18th, housing 15th.
Q5
Is tract 21037052302 considered part of California?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 21037052302 fall within California (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 21037052302 compare to Fort Thomas overall?
Tract 21037052302 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Fort Thomas at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Thomas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 21037052302 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fort Thomas
Top eight tracts in Fort Thomas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related