Census Tract · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally
Lakeside Park Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 21117064600 ·
Kenton County, KY · pop 5,317 · 43% of tract blocks fall in Lakeside Park
Tract 21117064600, home to 5,317 residents in Lakeside Park, scores 4.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 29% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 38% of renter households, a high level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $985 a month against an average household income of $62,493 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 43% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%Stable renters 27%Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units2,405
Renter share42.9%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$62,493
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Lakeside Park
Moderate
Within county
44th percentile
#25 of 44 tracts In Kenton County
Moderate
Within state
17th percentile
#1,090 of 1,306 tracts In Kentucky
Very Low
National
27th percentile
#61,757 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lakeside Park and the region
Centroid at 39.0337, -84.5693 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lakeside Park scores 2.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lakeside Park
4.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Kentucky legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$985 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lakeside Park
2.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lakeside Park
5.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lakeside Park
2.2
How Lakeside Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 38
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 5.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lakeside Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Kenton County average of 5.0 and in line with the Kentucky statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 38th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 21117064600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 21117064600?
Census tract 21117064600 in Lakeside Park scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 21117064600?
Median gross rent is $985/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 21117064600?
7.1% of residents in tract 21117064600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,317.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 21117064600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 28th, minority 22th, housing 77th.
Q5
How does tract 21117064600 compare to Lakeside Park overall?
Tract 21117064600 scores 2.8/10, higher than the parent city of Lakeside Park at 1.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lakeside Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.