Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,618 of 84,120 nationally

Kenwood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Catonsville

Tract 24005400100 · Baltimore County, MD · pop 4,398 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 24005400100 covers part of the Kenwood area of Catonsville, MD, and scores 5.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. 56% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 41% Stable renters 11% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units2,350
Renter share52.3%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$71,330

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Kenwood
Very High
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 13 tracts In Catonsville
High
Within county
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#102 of 219 tracts In Baltimore County
Moderate
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#571 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Catonsville and the region

Centroid at 39.2673, -76.7074 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kenwood scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Catonsville
8.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.4
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$2,651 rent vs county FMR
8.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catonsville
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catonsville
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catonsville
5.9

How Kenwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kenwood risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.9This tracttract 4001005.9Catonsvilleparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county5.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 57

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Kenwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kenwood

Against Baltimore County at 46.8%, 79% of renters here are cost-burdened. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 10/10. At $2,651 a month, rents run 54% over what the rest of Catonsville commands.

Annualized rent equals 45% of average household income of $71,330, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. The voucher gap is 34.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

On the high side, local political climate reads 8.9/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.2/10.

SNAP participation runs 5.5% against 15.2% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Baltimore. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #19,618 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 24005400100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24005400100?

Census tract 24005400100 in the Kenwood neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24005400100?

Median gross rent is $2,651/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 79% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24005400100?

4.7% of residents in tract 24005400100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,398.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24005400100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 70th, minority 45th, housing 88th.
Q5

Is tract 24005400100 considered part of Kenwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24005400100 fall within Kenwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 24005400100 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 24005400100 compare to Catonsville overall?

Tract 24005400100 scores 5.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Catonsville at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catonsville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 24005400100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Catonsville

Top eight tracts in Catonsville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related