Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #80,791 of 84,120 nationally

Heather Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Bowie

Tract 24033800505 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 2,454 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 24033800505 covers the Heather Hills area of Bowie, home to 2,454 residents. For landlords it grades $1/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than about 95% of US census tracts.

50% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,839 a month while the average household earns $134,167 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 5% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 3% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units936
Renter share5.3%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate3.5%
Median income$134,167

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Heather Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 15 tracts In Bowie
Moderate
Within county
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#187 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Very Low
Within state
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#1,267 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bowie and the region

Centroid at 38.9581, -76.7307 · click any tract to drill in

Why Heather Hills scores 1.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bowie
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
3.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,839 rent vs county FMR
7.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bowie
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bowie
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bowie
4.6

How Heather Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Heather Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.31.3This tracttract 800505Bowie: 6.16.1Bowieparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 11

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 4Total filings over 3 yrs
  • 1.27%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.6%Peak (2011)
  • 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338005052011: 2 filings (1.59/100 renter HHs)2012: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (0.79/100 renter HHs)2016: 1 filings (1.43/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Heather Hills

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 7.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Bowie eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and above the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 4 eviction filings here over 3 tracked years, with about 1.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.6% of renter households in 2011.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 11th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033800505

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033800505?

Census tract 24033800505 in the Heather Hills neighborhood scores 1.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033800505?

Median gross rent is $2,839/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033800505?

3.5% of residents in tract 24033800505 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,454.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033800505?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 28th, minority 66th, housing 14th.
Q5

Is tract 24033800505 considered part of Heather Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033800505 fall within Heather Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033800505?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 4 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 24033800505 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.27% of renter households, peaking at 1.6% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033800505 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033800505 compare to Bowie overall?

Tract 24033800505 scores 1.3/10, lower than the parent city of Bowie at 6.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bowie eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Bowie

Top eight tracts in Bowie ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related