Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally
Holmehurst Eviction Risk: Lower , Fairwood
Tract 24033800514 ·
Prince George's County, MD · pop 6,994 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
The Elevated-tier score of $1/10 for census tract 24033800514 reflects conditions in the Holmehurst area of Fairwood, Maryland. On the national scale it ranks #4,565 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 45% of renter households, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,501 monthly, set against $179,340 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 9% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%Stable renters 5%Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units2,193
Renter share9.3%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate4.2%
Median income$179,340
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Holmehurst
Very High
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Fairwood
Moderate
Within county
5th percentile
#203 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Very Low
Within state
11th percentile
#1,304 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fairwood and the region
Centroid at 38.9593, -76.7835 · click any tract to drill in
Why Holmehurst scores 1.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fairwood
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
4.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fairwood
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fairwood
2.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fairwood
4.6
How Holmehurst compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 14
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
3%Socioeconomic
43%Household composition
94%Racial/ethnic minority
13%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
18Total filings over 4 yrs
4.22%Avg annual filing rate
6.5%Peak (2011)
4Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2011 to 2016
Filings dropped 33% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Holmehurst. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.5%Housing insecurity
8.4%Utility-shutoff threat
13.0%Food insecurity
8.3%SNAP enrollment
6.8%Transit barriers
5.7%No health insurance
11.9%Frequent mental distress
19.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Holmehurst
What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fairwood, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and above the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 18 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 4.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.5% of renter households in 2011.
In CDC survey modeling, about 13.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 24033800514
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033800514?
Census tract 24033800514 in the Holmehurst neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 24033800514?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 24033800514?
4.2% of residents in tract 24033800514 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,994.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 24033800514?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 43th, minority 94th, housing 13th.
Q5
Is tract 24033800514 considered part of Holmehurst?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033800514 fall within Holmehurst (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033800514?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 18 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033800514 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.22% of renter households, peaking at 6.5% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 24033800514 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 24033800514 compare to Fairwood overall?
Tract 24033800514 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Fairwood at 6.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fairwood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.