Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling View Eviction Risk: Lower , Lanham

Tract 24033803608 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 6,515 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 24033803608 belongs to the Rolling View area of Lanham, Maryland. It is home to 6,515 residents and scores $1/10, an elevated reading for landlords. That is riskier than about 95% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 48% of renter households, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,091 monthly, set against $95,701 in average yearly household income, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 14% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,835
Renter share28.0%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate7.5%
Median income$95,701

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Rolling View
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Lanham
Very High
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#130 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Low
Within state
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#813 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lanham and the region

Centroid at 38.9551, -76.8506 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling View scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lanham
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
7.5% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$2,091 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lanham
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lanham
5.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lanham
5.6

How Rolling View compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rolling View risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.92.9This tracttract 803608Lanham: 6.36.3Lanhamparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 77

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,031Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 59.58%Avg annual filing rate
  • 98.4%Peak (2016)
  • 372Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338036082011: 179 filings (38.00/100 renter HHs)2012: 176 filings (37.37/100 renter HHs)2014: 304 filings (64.54/100 renter HHs)2016: 372 filings (98.41/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 108% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling View

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 6.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lanham, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and above the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 23.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 77th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033803608

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033803608?

Census tract 24033803608 in the Rolling View neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033803608?

Median gross rent is $2,091/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033803608?

7.5% of residents in tract 24033803608 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,515.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033803608?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 77th, minority 97th, housing 54th.
Q5

Is tract 24033803608 considered part of Rolling View?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033803608 fall within Rolling View (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033803608?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,031 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033803608 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 59.58% of renter households, peaking at 98.4% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033803608 struggle to pay rent?

About 23.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033803608 compare to Lanham overall?

Tract 24033803608 scores 2.9/10, lower than the parent city of Lanham at 6.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lanham; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lanham

Top eight tracts in Lanham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related