Neighborhood · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally
Bellemead Eviction Risk: Lower , Landover Hills
Tract 24033803700 ·
Prince George's County, MD · pop 2,999 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Tract 24033803700 covers the Bellemead neighborhood of Landover Hills in Maryland. Home to 2,999 residents, it scores 6.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 87th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 36% of renter households, a high level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,573 a month while the average household earns $94,471 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. About 7% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 5%Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units813
Renter share7.3%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$94,471
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Bellemead
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Landover Hills
Moderate
Within county
30th percentile
#151 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Low
Within state
28th percentile
#1,060 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Landover Hills and the region
Centroid at 38.9434, -76.8882 · click any tract to drill in
Why Bellemead scores 2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Landover Hills
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$2,573 rent vs county FMR
6.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Landover Hills
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Landover Hills
2.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Landover Hills
4.9
How Bellemead compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 74
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
73%Socioeconomic
80%Household composition
93%Racial/ethnic minority
40%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
10Total filings over 4 yrs
1.98%Avg annual filing rate
3.8%Peak (2014)
1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2011 to 2016
Filings dropped 67% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
23.8%Housing insecurity
12.2%Utility-shutoff threat
27.3%Food insecurity
17.1%SNAP enrollment
11.9%Transit barriers
23.4%No health insurance
15.5%Frequent mental distress
29.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Bellemead
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 6.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Landover eviction risk Hills, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and in line with the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 74th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 23.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 24033803700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033803700?
Census tract 24033803700 in the Bellemead neighborhood scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 24033803700?
Median gross rent is $2,573/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 24033803700?
4.7% of residents in tract 24033803700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,999.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 24033803700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 80th, minority 93th, housing 40th.
Q5
Is tract 24033803700 considered part of Bellemead?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033803700 fall within Bellemead (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033803700?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 10 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033803700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.98% of renter households, peaking at 3.8% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 24033803700 struggle to pay rent?
About 23.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 24033803700 compare to Landover Hills overall?
Tract 24033803700 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Landover Hills at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Landover eviction risk Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.