Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Radiant Valley Eviction Risk: Lower , Cheverly

Tract 24033804101 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 2,744 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 24033804101 (Radiant Valley in Cheverly, Maryland) comes in at 7.1/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 96% of US census tracts.

66% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,694 monthly, set against $84,792 in average yearly household income, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 46% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 16% Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units1,072
Renter share45.5%
SVI overall0.66
Poverty rate8.2%
Median income$84,792

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Radiant Valley
Very Low
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Cheverly
Low
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#133 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#873 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cheverly and the region

Centroid at 38.9269, -76.9061 · click any tract to drill in

Why Radiant Valley scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cheverly
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
8.2% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,694 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cheverly
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cheverly
5.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cheverly
5.4

How Radiant Valley compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Radiant Valley risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 804101Cheverly: 6.56.5Cheverlyparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 66

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 3,809Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 163.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 231.4%Peak (2016)
  • 1,490Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338041012011: 299 filings (54.36/100 renter HHs)2012: 569 filings (103.45/100 renter HHs)2014: 1,451 filings (263.82/100 renter HHs)2016: 1,490 filings (231.37/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 398% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Radiant Valley. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Radiant Valley

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cheverly, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and above the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 22.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 14.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 3,809 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 163.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 231.4% of renter households in 2016.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033804101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033804101?

Census tract 24033804101 in the Radiant Valley neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033804101?

Median gross rent is $1,694/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 66% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033804101?

8.2% of residents in tract 24033804101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,744.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033804101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 66th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 38th, minority 84th, housing 67th.
Q5

Is tract 24033804101 considered part of Radiant Valley?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033804101 fall within Radiant Valley (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033804101?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3,809 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033804101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 163.25% of renter households, peaking at 231.4% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033804101 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033804101 compare to Cheverly overall?

Tract 24033804101 scores 2.7/10, lower than the parent city of Cheverly at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cheverly; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cheverly

Top eight tracts in Cheverly ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related