Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,427 of 84,120 nationally
Fallstaff Eviction Risk: Elevated , Baltimore
Tract 24510272007 · Baltimore city, MD · pop 3,697 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi
Tract 24510272007, home to 3,697 residents in the Fallstaff area of Baltimore, scores 7.4/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 98% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
69% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 42% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,489 monthly, set against $42,119 in average yearly household income, roughly 42% of income at the averages. Renters make up 62% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
7.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43%
Stable renters 19%
Owners 38%
Tract context
Occupied units1,588
Renter share62.2%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate24.7%
Median income$42,119
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
68
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
68
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
96
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Baltimore and the region
Centroid at 39.3637, -76.7065 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fallstaff scores 7.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Baltimore
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.8
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
24.7% poverty · this tract
6.2
Supply constraint
$1,489 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Baltimore
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Baltimore
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Baltimore
6.0
How Fallstaff compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 64
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 76%Socioeconomic
- 16%Household composition
- 76%Racial/ethnic minority
- 64%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 16%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 21.1%Housing insecurity
- 13.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 25.3%Food insecurity
- 23.5%SNAP enrollment
- 12.7%Transit barriers
- 12.7%No health insurance
- 17.4%Frequent mental distress
- 35.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fallstaff
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 6.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Baltimore eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Baltimore City County average of 7.1 and above the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 21.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 64th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 24510272007
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24510272007?
Census tract 24510272007 in the Fallstaff neighborhood scores 7.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 24510272007?
Median gross rent is $1,489/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 24510272007?
24.7% of residents in tract 24510272007 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,697.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 24510272007?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 16th, minority 76th, housing 64th.
Q5
Is tract 24510272007 considered part of Fallstaff?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24510272007 fall within Fallstaff (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 24510272007 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 24510272007 compare to Baltimore overall?
Tract 24510272007 scores 7.4/10, higher than the parent city of Baltimore at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Baltimore eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 24510272007 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Baltimore
Top eight tracts in Baltimore ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related