Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,043 of 84,120 nationally

Fallstaff Eviction Risk: Elevated , Baltimore

Tract 24510272007 · Baltimore city, MD · pop 3,697 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi

Tract 24510272007 sits in the Fallstaff area of Baltimore eviction risk, MD, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.8/10. It is home to 3,697 residents. Severe burden reaches 42%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
7.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43% Stable renters 19% Owners 38%
Tract context
Occupied units1,588
Renter share62.2%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate24.7%
Median income$42,119

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Fallstaff
Moderate
Within parent city
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#64 of 199 tracts In Baltimore
Elevated
Within county
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#59 of 199 tracts In Baltimore city
Elevated
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#126 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Baltimore and the region

Centroid at 39.3637, -76.7065 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fallstaff scores 7.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Baltimore
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.8
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
24.7% poverty · this tract
6.2
Supply constraint
$1,489 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Baltimore
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Baltimore
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Baltimore
6.0

How Fallstaff compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fallstaff risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.8This tracttract 2720076.6Baltimoreparent city6.8Countyavg tract in county5.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fallstaff

Against Baltimore City at 50.2%, roughly two in three of renters here are cost-burdened. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 10/10.

Set annual rent against average income of $42,119 and the ratio lands at 42%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. On the high side, regional political climate reads 8.8/10. The poverty rate is 25%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.6/10. Against the Baltimore City average of 6.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points.

SNAP participation runs 23.5% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 25.3% against 17.8% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,489, 12% above the Baltimore average.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #9,043 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the MD average is 5.5, so this tract runs 2.3 points hotter.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 24510272007

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24510272007?

Census tract 24510272007 in the Fallstaff neighborhood scores 7.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24510272007?

Median gross rent is $1,489/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24510272007?

24.7% of residents in tract 24510272007 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,697.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24510272007?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 16th, minority 76th, housing 64th.
Q5

Is tract 24510272007 considered part of Fallstaff?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24510272007 fall within Fallstaff (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 24510272007 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 24510272007 compare to Baltimore overall?

Tract 24510272007 scores 7.8/10, higher than the parent city of Baltimore at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Baltimore eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 24510272007 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Baltimore

Top eight tracts in Baltimore ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related