Tract 25021408104 Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 25021408104 · Norfolk County, MA · pop 4,824
Tract 25021408104 sits in Norfolk County, MA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.4/10. Population here is 4,824. Against Norfolk County at 48.1%, around a third of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Norfolk County and the region
Centroid at 42.1634, -71.4139 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 25021408104 scores 4.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 25021408104 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 11
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 8%Socioeconomic
- 30%Household composition
- 25%Racial/ethnic minority
- 20%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 0Total filings 2020-21
- 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.7%Food insecurity
- 7.8%SNAP enrollment
- 4.7%Transit barriers
- 2.9%No health insurance
- 14.0%Frequent mental distress
- 22.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tract 25021408104
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10.
Food insecurity runs 6.7% against 17.8% nationally. Against the Norfolk County average of 5.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points. Housing insecurity runs 6.3% against 14.2% nationally.
That is riskier than roughly 49% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 10% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Against average income of $182,057, annual rent is just 11%. Statewide the MA average is 6.2, so this tract runs 1.8 points cooler.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.