Tract 25021409102 Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 25021409102 · Norfolk County, MA · pop 5,511
Census tract 25021409102 covers part of Norfolk County, MA, and scores 4.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,511. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Norfolk County and the region
Centroid at 42.1181, -71.3544 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 25021409102 scores 4.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 25021409102 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 2
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 2%Socioeconomic
- 8%Household composition
- 22%Racial/ethnic minority
- 9%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 0Total filings 2020-21
- 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.4%Housing insecurity
- 3.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.2%Food insecurity
- 5.9%SNAP enrollment
- 4.0%Transit barriers
- 2.3%No health insurance
- 13.2%Frequent mental distress
- 19.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tract 25021409102
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10. 58% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Norfolk County average of 48.1%.
It sits 1.2 points below the Norfolk County average of 5.6. The severe-burden share is 11%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Adults with no health insurance runs 2.3% against 11.3% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. That is riskier than roughly 49% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 7% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.2/10.
Against average income of $201,705, annual rent is just 9%. Statewide the MA average is 6.2, so this tract runs 1.8 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.