Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Fairway Eviction Risk: Lower , Haslett
Tract 26065004802 ·
Ingham County, MI · pop 3,089 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 26065004802 sits in the Fairway area of Haslett, MI, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Severe burden reaches 61%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%Stable renters 6%Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,430
Renter share19.2%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$103,750
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Fairway
Moderate
Within parent city
40th percentile
#4 of 6 tracts In Haslett
Moderate
Within county
18th percentile
#69 of 84 tracts In Ingham County
Very Low
Within state
26th percentile
#2,190 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Haslett and the region
Centroid at 42.7473, -84.3717 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fairway scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Haslett
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,179 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Haslett
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Haslett
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Haslett
5.9
How Fairway compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
4%Socioeconomic
3%Household composition
26%Racial/ethnic minority
7%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
6.4%Housing insecurity
4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
6.8%Food insecurity
5.6%SNAP enrollment
4.6%Transit barriers
3.8%No health insurance
14.1%Frequent mental distress
22.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fairway
Against Ingham County at 46.5%, around two-thirds of renters here are cost-burdened. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Running cool, economic stress reads 1.3/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.4/10.
It sits 1.6 points below the Ingham County average of 4.6. SNAP participation runs 5.6% against 15.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.8% against 11.3% nationally.
Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 19% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Against average income of $103,750, annual rent is just 14%. Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 26065004802
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065004802?
Census tract 26065004802 in the Fairway neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 26065004802?
Median gross rent is $1,179/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 26065004802?
5.2% of residents in tract 26065004802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,089.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 26065004802?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 3th, minority 26th, housing 7th.
Q5
Is tract 26065004802 considered part of Fairway?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26065004802 fall within Fairway (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 26065004802 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 26065004802 compare to Haslett overall?
Tract 26065004802 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Haslett at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Haslett; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Haslett
Top eight tracts in Haslett ranked by composite eviction-risk score.