Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally
Fairway Eviction Risk: Lower , Haslett
Tract 26065004802 · Ingham County, MI · pop 3,089 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
In the Fairway area of Haslett, census tract 26065004802 scores 6.4/10 for eviction risk. It lands near the 85th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
70% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 61% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,179 a month while the average household earns $103,750 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 19% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,430
Renter share19.2%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$103,750
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
40
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
11
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Haslett and the region
Centroid at 42.7473, -84.3717 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fairway scores 2.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Haslett
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,179 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Haslett
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Haslett
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Haslett
5.9
How Fairway compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 4%Socioeconomic
- 3%Household composition
- 26%Racial/ethnic minority
- 7%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.4%Housing insecurity
- 4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.8%Food insecurity
- 5.6%SNAP enrollment
- 4.6%Transit barriers
- 3.8%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 22.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fairway
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Haslett, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Ingham County average of 6.2 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 1st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 26065004802
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065004802?
Census tract 26065004802 in the Fairway neighborhood scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 26065004802?
Median gross rent is $1,179/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 26065004802?
5.2% of residents in tract 26065004802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,089.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 26065004802?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 3th, minority 26th, housing 7th.
Q5
Is tract 26065004802 considered part of Fairway?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26065004802 fall within Fairway (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 26065004802 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 26065004802 compare to Haslett overall?
Tract 26065004802 scores 2.3/10, lower than the parent city of Haslett at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Haslett; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Haslett
Top eight tracts in Haslett ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related