Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Sagamore Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Lansing

Tract 26065007000 · Ingham County, MI · pop 5,977 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 26065007000 runs through Sagamore Hills in Lansing. With 5,977 residents, it scores 5.3/10 for landlords. It lands near the 49th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 28% of renter households, a moderate level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,079 a month against an average household income of $70,284 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 20% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units2,625
Renter share28.3%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate8.7%
Median income$70,284

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Sagamore Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#37 of 41 tracts In Lansing
Very Low
Within county
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#48 of 84 tracts In Ingham County
Moderate
Within state
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#1,220 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lansing and the region

Centroid at 42.7116, -84.5689 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sagamore Hills scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lansing
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
8.7% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,079 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lansing
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lansing
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lansing
4.5

How Sagamore Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sagamore Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 007000Lansing: 3.73.7Lansingparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 44

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sagamore Hills

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lansing eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Ingham County average of 6.2 and below the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 44th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 26065007000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065007000?

Census tract 26065007000 in the Sagamore Hills neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26065007000?

Median gross rent is $1,079/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26065007000?

8.7% of residents in tract 26065007000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,977.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26065007000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 46th, household 77th, minority 53th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 26065007000 considered part of Sagamore Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26065007000 fall within Sagamore Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 26065007000 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 26065007000 compare to Lansing overall?

Tract 26065007000 scores 3.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Lansing at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lansing eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 26065007000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lansing

Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related