Neighborhood · Ranked #11,930 of 84,120 nationally

Stadium District Eviction Risk: Elevated , Lansing

Tract 26065006600 · Ingham County, MI · pop 2,989 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

For landlords sizing up the Stadium District neighborhood of Lansing, census tract 26065006600 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 6.4/10. That is riskier than about 85% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 43% of renter households, a severe level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $966 a month against an average household income of $39,382 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. About 79% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 34% Stable renters 45% Owners 21%

Tract context

Occupied units1,630

Renter share78.7%

SVI overall0.94

Poverty rate33.0%

Median income$39,382

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Lansing and the region

Centroid at 42.7350, -84.5456 · click any tract to drill in

Why Stadium District scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Lansing

6.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

6.6

State political climate

Michigan legislature & governorship

3.3

Economic stress

33.0% poverty · this tract

8.2

Supply constraint

$966 rent vs county FMR

3.6

Rent control risk

Inherited from Lansing

2.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

4.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Lansing

5.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Lansing

4.5

How Stadium District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

89%Socioeconomic
61%Household composition
67%Racial/ethnic minority
99%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
5%Grade B
70%Grade C
16%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

19.5%Housing insecurity
15.1%Utility-shutoff threat
26.7%Food insecurity
27.7%SNAP enrollment
14.4%Transit barriers
11.6%No health insurance
21.5%Frequent mental distress
36.6%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Stadium District

What moves this score most is economic stress at 8.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lansing eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Ingham County average of 6.2 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Part of this tract, about 16% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

In CDC survey modeling, about 19.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 15.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 26065006600

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065006600?

Census tract 26065006600 in the Stadium District neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 26065006600?

Median gross rent is $966/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 26065006600?

33.0% of residents in tract 26065006600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,989.

How socially vulnerable is tract 26065006600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 61th, minority 67th, housing 99th.

Is tract 26065006600 considered part of Stadium District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26065006600 fall within Stadium District (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 26065006600 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 26065006600 compare to Lansing overall?

Tract 26065006600 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Lansing at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lansing eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 26065006600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 16% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lansing

Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.