Stadium District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lansing
Tract 26065006600 · Ingham County, MI · pop 2,989 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 26065006600 covers part of the Stadium District area of Lansing, MI, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lansing and the region
Centroid at 42.7350, -84.5456 · click any tract to drill in
Why Stadium District scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Stadium District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 94
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 89%Socioeconomic
- 61%Household composition
- 67%Racial/ethnic minority
- 99%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 5%Grade B
- 70%Grade C
- 16%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 19.5%Housing insecurity
- 15.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 26.7%Food insecurity
- 27.7%SNAP enrollment
- 14.4%Transit barriers
- 11.6%No health insurance
- 21.5%Frequent mental distress
- 36.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Stadium District
This is renter territory: 79% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. The poverty rate is 33%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, economic stress reads 8.2/10.
Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10. SNAP participation runs 27.7% against 15.2% nationally. The severe-burden share is 12%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Against the Ingham County average of 4.6, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.8 points. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lansing. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #24,859 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 9.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 26065006600
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065006600?
What is the average rent in tract 26065006600?
What is the poverty rate in tract 26065006600?
How socially vulnerable is tract 26065006600?
Is tract 26065006600 considered part of Stadium District?
What share of households in tract 26065006600 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 26065006600 compare to Lansing overall?
Was tract 26065006600 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lansing
Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.