Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Noble Eviction Risk: Lower , Spring Arbor
Tract 26075005400 ·
Jackson County, MI · pop 7,148 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
26075005400 is a census tract in the Noble area of Spring Arbor, MI. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Against Jackson County at 38.3%, 18% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 12%Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units2,076
Renter share15.3%
SVI overall0.25
Poverty rate5.7%
Median income$85,117
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Noble
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Spring Arbor
Moderate
Within county
16th percentile
#39 of 46 tracts In Jackson County
Very Low
Within state
26th percentile
#2,190 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Spring Arbor and the region
Centroid at 42.2063, -84.5256 · click any tract to drill in
Why Noble scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Spring Arbor
4.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
5.7% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,312 rent vs county FMR
6.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Spring Arbor
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Spring Arbor
6.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Spring Arbor
3.5
How Noble compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 25
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
7%Socioeconomic
41%Household composition
7%Racial/ethnic minority
72%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
726Total filings over 9 yrs
19.31%Avg annual filing rate
28.5%Peak (2014)
33Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year2010 to 2018
Filings dropped 67% over the past 9 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
7.8%Housing insecurity
5.3%Utility-shutoff threat
9.4%Food insecurity
7.4%SNAP enrollment
6.1%Transit barriers
5.2%No health insurance
18.0%Frequent mental distress
29.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Noble
At $1,312 a month, rents run 44% over what the rest of Spring Arbor commands. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.4/10. The voucher gap is 18.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Against the Jackson County average of 4.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.1 points. The filing record is not thin: 726 evictions over 9 years of observation. Food insecurity runs 9.4% against 17.8% nationally.
The severe-burden share is 8%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. SNAP participation runs 7.4% against 15.2% nationally.
The worst year on record was 2014, when 28.5% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 19.3% of renter households face a filing.
Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 15% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 3.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 26075005400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26075005400?
Census tract 26075005400 in the Noble neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 26075005400?
Median gross rent is $1,312/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 18% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 26075005400?
5.7% of residents in tract 26075005400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,148.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 26075005400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 25th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 41th, minority 7th, housing 72th.
Q5
Is tract 26075005400 considered part of Noble?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26075005400 fall within Noble (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 26075005400?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 726 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 26075005400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 19.31% of renter households, peaking at 28.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 26075005400 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 26075005400 compare to Spring Arbor overall?
Tract 26075005400 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Spring Arbor at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Spring Arbor; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.