Census Tract · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Tract 26125130300 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 26125130300 ·
Oakland County, MI · pop 4,237
Census tract 26125130300 covers part of Oakland County, MI, and scores 3.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,237 residents. Against Oakland County at 39.8%, roughly one in four of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 6%Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,516
Renter share8.1%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate8.1%
Median income$102,500
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
52th percentile
#170 of 350 tracts In Oakland County
Moderate
Within state
48th percentile
#1,542 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Moderate
National
38th percentile
#52,479 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Oakland County and the region
Centroid at 42.6251, -83.5352 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 26125130300 scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
3.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
8.1% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
State baseline
3.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tract 26125130300 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 27
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
10.6%Housing insecurity
7.9%Utility-shutoff threat
14.2%Food insecurity
12.9%SNAP enrollment
7.6%Transit barriers
6.5%No health insurance
17.8%Frequent mental distress
27.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tract 26125130300
The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.5/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 2/10. 15% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
On the national scale it lands near the 38th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 8% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.4/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Model confidence here is 65%, lower than typical because some ACS inputs for this tract carry wide margins of error, so read the score as a band, not a point. It tracks the Oakland County average of 4.0 closely.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 26125130300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125130300?
Census tract 26125130300 in Oakland County scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 26125130300?
8.1% of residents in tract 26125130300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,237.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 26125130300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 6th, minority 29th, housing 64th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 26125130300 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.