Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,618 of 84,120 nationally

Five Points Eviction Risk: Moderate , Southfield

Tract 26125162500 · Oakland County, MI · pop 3,307 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

With a score of 5.9/10, tract 26125162500 in the Five Points area of Southfield, MI reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,307 residents. 32% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 25% Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units1,827
Renter share50.7%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate15.0%
Median income$47,088

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Five Points
Moderate
Within parent city
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 23 tracts In Southfield
Elevated
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#23 of 350 tracts In Oakland County
Very High
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#355 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Southfield and the region

Centroid at 42.4497, -83.2978 · click any tract to drill in

Why Five Points scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Southfield
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
15.0% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,180 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Southfield
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Southfield
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Southfield
6.7

How Five Points compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Five Points risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.9This tracttract 1625004.5Southfieldparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Five Points

The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.5/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10.

Against Oakland County at 39.8%, 51% of renters here are cost-burdened. Against the Oakland County average of 4.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.9 points. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.7/10.

SNAP participation runs 26.0% against 15.2% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

At $1,180 a month, rents run 12% under what the rest of Southfield commands. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Detroit. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #19,618 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Social vulnerability reads 4.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 26125162500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125162500?

Census tract 26125162500 in the Five Points neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26125162500?

Median gross rent is $1,180/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26125162500?

15.0% of residents in tract 26125162500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,307.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26125162500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 12th, minority 84th, housing 23th.
Q5

Is tract 26125162500 considered part of Five Points?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26125162500 fall within Five Points (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 26125162500 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 26125162500 compare to Southfield overall?

Tract 26125162500 scores 5.9/10, higher than the parent city of Southfield at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Southfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 26125162500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Southfield

Top eight tracts in Southfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related