Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally
St. Francis Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 27003050108 · Anoka County, MN · pop 5,737 · 75% of tract blocks fall in St. Francis
Census tract 27003050108 sits in St. Francis in Anoka County, Minnesota eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 4.6/10. That is riskier than about 26% of US census tracts.
About 34% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,150 a month while the average household earns $102,589 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. About 20% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units2,037
Renter share19.8%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate4.6%
Median income$102,589
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
63
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
35
th percentile
Low
National
21
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across St. Francis and the region
Centroid at 45.3988, -93.3276 · click any tract to drill in
Why St. Francis scores 2.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from St. Francis
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
4.6% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,150 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Francis
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Francis
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Francis
4.2
How St. Francis compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 22
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 17%Socioeconomic
- 34%Household composition
- 19%Racial/ethnic minority
- 40%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 90Total filings over 4 yrs
- 7.80%Avg annual filing rate
- 8.8%Peak (2010)
- 18Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.3%Housing insecurity
- 6.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.5%Food insecurity
- 7.5%SNAP enrollment
- 7.3%Transit barriers
- 7.7%No health insurance
- 17.7%Frequent mental distress
- 27.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in St. Francis
The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 4.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Francis, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Anoka County average of 5.3 and below the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 90 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 7.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.8% of renter households in 2010.
In CDC survey modeling, about 10.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 27003050108
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003050108?
Census tract 27003050108 in St. Francis scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27003050108?
Median gross rent is $1,150/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27003050108?
4.6% of residents in tract 27003050108 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,737.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27003050108?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 34th, minority 19th, housing 40th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003050108?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 90 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003050108 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.80% of renter households, peaking at 8.8% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 27003050108 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 27003050108 compare to St. Francis overall?
Tract 27003050108 scores 2.5/10, lower than the parent city of St. Francis at 4.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Francis; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in St. Francis
Top eight tracts in St. Francis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related