Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally

Anoka Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27003050401 · Anoka County, MN · pop 3,235

Census tract 27003050401 runs through Anoka. With 3,235 residents, it scores 5.6/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #33,053 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 57% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,192 a month against an average household income of $99,556 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. About 30% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 13% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,109
Renter share29.7%
SVI overall0.56
Poverty rate4.4%
Median income$99,556

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Anoka
Very Low
Within county
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#33 of 90 tracts In Anoka County
Elevated
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#979 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
National
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#66,742 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Anoka and the region

Centroid at 45.2152, -93.4015 · click any tract to drill in

Why Anoka scores 2.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Anoka
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
4.4% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,192 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Anoka
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Anoka
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Anoka
5.5

How Anoka compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Anoka risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.52.5This tracttract 050401Anoka: 4.94.9Anokaparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 56

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 117Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 6.35%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.7%Peak (2009)
  • 29Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270030504012009: 33 filings (4.74/100 renter HHs)2010: 27 filings (7.50/100 renter HHs)2011: 28 filings (6.47/100 renter HHs)2012: 29 filings (6.70/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Anoka

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Anoka, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Anoka County average of 5.3 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 56th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27003050401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003050401?

Census tract 27003050401 in Anoka scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27003050401?

Median gross rent is $1,192/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27003050401?

4.4% of residents in tract 27003050401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,235.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27003050401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 56th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 39th, household 70th, minority 44th, housing 66th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003050401?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 117 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003050401 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.35% of renter households, peaking at 4.7% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 27003050401 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27003050401 compare to Anoka overall?

Tract 27003050401 scores 2.5/10, lower than the parent city of Anoka at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Anoka; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Anoka

Top eight tracts in Anoka ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related