Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Anoka Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27003050402 · Anoka County, MN · pop 3,610

In Anoka, census tract 27003050402 scores $1/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #21,295 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

56% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,330 a month while the average household earns $66,621 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 56% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 25% Owners 43%
Tract context
Occupied units1,513
Renter share56.4%
SVI overall0.84
Poverty rate15.3%
Median income$66,621

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Anoka
Very High
Within county
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 90 tracts In Anoka County
High
Within state
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#606 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Elevated
National
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#42,763 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Anoka and the region

Centroid at 45.2037, -93.4077 · click any tract to drill in

Why Anoka scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Anoka
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
15.3% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,330 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Anoka
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Anoka
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Anoka
5.5

How Anoka compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Anoka risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 050402Anoka: 4.94.9Anokaparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 84

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 191Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 5.39%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.6%Peak (2012)
  • 56Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270030504022009: 44 filings (6.82/100 renter HHs)2010: 44 filings (4.42/100 renter HHs)2011: 47 filings (4.70/100 renter HHs)2012: 56 filings (5.61/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 27% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Anoka

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Anoka, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Anoka County average of 5.3 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 84th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 27003050402

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003050402?

Census tract 27003050402 in Anoka scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27003050402?

Median gross rent is $1,330/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27003050402?

15.3% of residents in tract 27003050402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,610.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27003050402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 84th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 80th, minority 34th, housing 99th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003050402?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 191 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003050402 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.39% of renter households, peaking at 5.6% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 27003050402 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27003050402 compare to Anoka overall?

Tract 27003050402 scores 3.9/10, lower than the parent city of Anoka at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Anoka; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Anoka

Top eight tracts in Anoka ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related