Within parent city
67
th percentile
Elevated
Census Tract · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally
Fridley Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 27003051102 · Anoka County, MN · pop 4,325
The Moderate-tier score of 5.8/10 for census tract 27003051102 reflects conditions in Fridley in Anoka County, Minnesota. That is riskier than roughly 68% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 41% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,260 monthly, set against $78,625 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 8% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 5%
Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,552
Renter share7.6%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate13.0%
Median income$78,625
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
90
th percentile
High
Within state
64
th percentile
Elevated
National
53
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fridley and the region
Centroid at 45.0967, -93.2537 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fridley scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fridley
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
13.0% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,260 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fridley
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fridley
7.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fridley
5.9
How Fridley compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 62
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 41%Socioeconomic
- 45%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 88%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 134Total filings over 4 yrs
- 12.58%Avg annual filing rate
- 16.2%Peak (2012)
- 43Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 59% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.3%Housing insecurity
- 6.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.8%Food insecurity
- 9.5%SNAP enrollment
- 8.6%Transit barriers
- 11.4%No health insurance
- 15.6%Frequent mental distress
- 30.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fridley
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 7.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fridley eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Anoka County average of 5.3 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 62nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 27003051102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003051102?
Census tract 27003051102 in Fridley scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27003051102?
Median gross rent is $1,260/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27003051102?
13.0% of residents in tract 27003051102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,325.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27003051102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 45th, minority 54th, housing 88th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003051102?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 134 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003051102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.58% of renter households, peaking at 16.2% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 27003051102 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 27003051102 compare to Fridley overall?
Tract 27003051102 scores 4.1/10, lower than the parent city of Fridley at 5.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fridley eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fridley
Top eight tracts in Fridley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related