Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally
Taylors Falls Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 27025110700 · Chisago County, MN · pop 4,248 · 25% of tract blocks fall in Taylors Falls
With a score of 4.9/10, tract 27025110700 in Taylors Falls ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 4,248 residents. That is riskier than about 35% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 52% of renter households, a severe level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $977 a month while the average household earns $96,579 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 15% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,574
Renter share14.6%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate4.1%
Median income$96,579
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
25
th percentile
Low
Within state
21
th percentile
Low
National
11
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Taylors Falls and the region
Centroid at 45.4662, -92.7435 · click any tract to drill in
Why Taylors Falls scores 1.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Taylors Falls
4.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
4.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$977 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Taylors Falls
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Taylors Falls
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Taylors Falls
5.6
How Taylors Falls compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 29
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 24%Socioeconomic
- 32%Household composition
- 20%Racial/ethnic minority
- 52%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 17Total filings over 2 yrs
- 4.38%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.1%Peak (2013)
- 12Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.6%Housing insecurity
- 5.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.9%Food insecurity
- 6.8%SNAP enrollment
- 6.3%Transit barriers
- 6.6%No health insurance
- 15.7%Frequent mental distress
- 28.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Taylors Falls
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Taylors Falls, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Chisago County average of 4.3 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 29th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 27025110700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27025110700?
Census tract 27025110700 in Taylors Falls scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27025110700?
Median gross rent is $977/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27025110700?
4.1% of residents in tract 27025110700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,248.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27025110700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 32th, minority 20th, housing 52th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27025110700?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 17 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 27025110700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.38% of renter households, peaking at 6.1% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 27025110700 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 27025110700 compare to Taylors Falls overall?
Tract 27025110700 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Taylors Falls at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Taylors Falls; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related