Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Pennsylvania Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Golden Valley

Tract 27053022102 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 2,861 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

The Pennsylvania Park area of Golden Valley is where census tract 27053022102 sits, home to 2,861 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 4.5/10. On the national scale it ranks #64,870 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 33% of renter households, a high level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,229 a month against an average household income of $69,813 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 36% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 24% Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units1,479
Renter share36.2%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate3.5%
Median income$69,813

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Pennsylvania Park
Very High
Within parent city
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 15 tracts In Golden Valley
High
Within county
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#146 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Elevated
Within state
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#606 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Golden Valley and the region

Centroid at 44.9638, -93.3766 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pennsylvania Park scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Golden Valley
7.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
3.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,229 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Golden Valley
3.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Golden Valley
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Golden Valley
4.1

How Pennsylvania Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pennsylvania Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 022102Golden Valley: 5.15.1Golden Valleyparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 44

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 71Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 3.19%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.2%Peak (2010)
  • 6Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270530221022009: 12 filings (3.67/100 renter HHs)2010: 20 filings (5.24/100 renter HHs)2011: 19 filings (3.43/100 renter HHs)2012: 14 filings (2.53/100 renter HHs)2013: 6 filings (1.08/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 88Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.12×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (1.42× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (6.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (1.79× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (2.27× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (2.68× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (3.62× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (2.68× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-01-01: 7 filings (3.30× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (3.57× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.72× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (1.23× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pennsylvania Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pennsylvania Park

What moves this score most is housing court bias at 4.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Golden Valley eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and below the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 44th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053022102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053022102?

Census tract 27053022102 in the Pennsylvania Park neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053022102?

Median gross rent is $1,229/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053022102?

3.5% of residents in tract 27053022102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,861.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053022102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 44th, minority 34th, housing 72th.
Q5

Is tract 27053022102 considered part of Pennsylvania Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053022102 fall within Pennsylvania Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053022102?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 71 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053022102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.19% of renter households, peaking at 5.2% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27053022102 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.12× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27053022102 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27053022102 compare to Golden Valley overall?

Tract 27053022102 scores 3.9/10, lower than the parent city of Golden Valley at 5.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Golden Valley eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Golden Valley

Top eight tracts in Golden Valley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related