Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #57,812 of 84,120 nationally
Pennsylvania Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Golden Valley
Tract 27053021900 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 4,100 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
With a score of 3.5/10, tract 27053021900 in the Pennsylvania Park area of Golden Valley, MN reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,100 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20%
Stable renters 29%
Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units1,920
Renter share48.7%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$111,597
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
31
th percentile
Low
Within state
34
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Golden Valley and the region
Centroid at 44.9764, -93.3725 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pennsylvania Park scores 3.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Golden Valley
7.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,260 rent vs county FMR
8.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Golden Valley
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Golden Valley
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Golden Valley
5.2
How Pennsylvania Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 15
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 6%Socioeconomic
- 21%Household composition
- 29%Racial/ethnic minority
- 45%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 73Total filings over 5 yrs
- 3.94%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.3%Peak (2009)
- 2Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 93% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 102Total filings 2020-21
- 1.3Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
- 3.32×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Pennsylvania Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.1%Housing insecurity
- 3.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.2%Food insecurity
- 3.6%SNAP enrollment
- 4.6%Transit barriers
- 5.2%No health insurance
- 12.9%Frequent mental distress
- 21.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pennsylvania Park
The voucher gap is 34.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.4/10.
At $2,260 a month, rents run 27% over what the rest of Golden Valley commands. Against the Hennepin County average of 5.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.6 points.
Food insecurity runs 6.2% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 3.6% against 15.2% nationally. Severe burden reaches 13%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.4/10. The filing record is not thin: 73 evictions over 5 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2009 at 6.3% of renter households.
In a typical year about 3.9% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #57,812 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 27053021900
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053021900?
Census tract 27053021900 in the Pennsylvania Park neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27053021900?
Median gross rent is $2,260/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27053021900?
3.8% of residents in tract 27053021900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,100.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27053021900?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 21th, minority 29th, housing 45th.
Q5
Is tract 27053021900 considered part of Pennsylvania Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053021900 fall within Pennsylvania Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053021900?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 73 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053021900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.94% of renter households, peaking at 6.3% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 27053021900 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 3.32× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 27053021900 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 27053021900 compare to Golden Valley overall?
Tract 27053021900 scores 3.5/10, lower than the parent city of Golden Valley at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Golden Valley eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Golden Valley
Top eight tracts in Golden Valley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related